RESUMEN
Background: It has been previously reported during the first COVID outbreak that patients presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and concurrent COVID-19 infection have increased thrombus burden and poorer outcomes [1]. Subsequently, there have been multiple further waves of the pandemic with the emergence of at least two new COVID-19 variants and the emergence of vaccinations. To-date, there have been no reports comparing the outcomes of COVID-19-positive STEMI patients across all waves of the pandemic. Purpose(s): The purpose of this study was to compare the baseline demographic, procedural and angiographic characteristics alongside the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI and concurrent COVID-19 infection across the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Method(s): This was a single-centre, observational study of 1250 consecutive patients admitted with confirmed STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Barts Heart Centre between 01/03/2020 and 10/03/2022. COVID +ve patients were split into 3 groups based upon the time course of the pandemic (Wave 1: March 2020-June 2020, Wave 2: Sept 2020-March 2021, Wave 3: October 2021-March 2022). Comparison was made between waves and with a control group of COVID-ve patients treated during the same timeframe. Result(s): A total of 135 COVID +ive patients with STEMI (1st Wave: 39 patients, 2nd Wave: 60 patients, 3rd wave 35 pts) were included in the present analysis;and compared with 1115 COVID negative patients. Significant changes in the baseline characteristics, angiographic features and clinical outcomes of COVID +ive patients occurred over time. Early during the pandemic (Wave 1 2020), STEMI patients presenting with concurrent COVID-19 infection had high rates of cardiac arrest, evidence of increased thrombus burden (higher rates of multi-vessel thrombosis, stent thrombosis, higher modified thrombus grade higher use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombus aspiration, coagulability (more heparin for therapeutic ACT), bigger infarcts (lower myocardial blush grade and left ventricular function) and worse outcomes (mortality). However, by wave 3 (late 2021/2022), no differences existed in clinical characteristics, thrombus burden, infarct size or outcomes between COVID +ive patients and those without concurrent COVID-19 infection with significant differences compared to earlier COVID +ve patients. Poor outcomes later in the study period were predominantly in unvaccinated individuals. Conclusion(s): Significant changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics, angiographic features and outcomes of STEMI patients with COVID- 19 infection treated by primary PCI during the course of the pandemic. Importantly it appears that angiographic features and outcomes of recent waves are no different to a non-COVID-19 population.
RESUMEN
Objectives: The clinical environment has been forced to adapt to meet the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive care facilities were expanded in anticipation of the pandemic where the consequences include severe delays in elective procedures. Emergent procedures such as Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in which delays in timely delivery have well established ad-verse prognostic effects must also be explored in the context of changes in procedure and public behaviour as-sociated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim for this single centre retrospective cohort study is to determine if door-to-balloon (D2B) times in PCI for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) during the United Kingdom's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic differed from pre-COVID-19 populations. Methods: Data was extracted from our single centre PCI database for all patients that underwent pPCI for STEMI. The reference (Pre-COVID-19) cohort was collected over the period 01-03-2019 to 31-05-2019 and the exposure group (COVID-19) over the period 01-03-2020 to 31-05-2020. Baseline patient characteristics for both populations were extracted. The primary outcome measurement was D2B times. Secondary outcome measurements included: time of symptom onset to call for help, transfer time to first hospital, transfer time from non-PCI to PCI centre, time from call-to-help to PCI centre, time to table and onset of symptoms to balloon time. Categorical and continuous variables were assessed with Chi squared and Mann-Whitney U analysis respectively. Procedural times were calculated and compared in the context of het-erogeneity findings. Results: 4 baseline patient characteristics were unbalanced between populations with statisti-cal significance (P<0.05). The pre-covid-19 cohort was more likely to have suffered out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and had left circumflex disease, whereas the 1st wave cohort were more likely to have been investigated with left ventriculography and be of Afro-Caribbean origin. No statistically significant difference in in-hospital procedural times was found with D2B, C2B, O2B times comparable between groups. Pre-hospital delays were the greatest contributors in missed target times: the 1st wave group had significantly longer delayed time of symptom onset to call for help (Control: 31 mins;IQR [82.5] vs 1st wave: 60 mins;IQR [90.0], P=0.001) and time taken from call for help to arrival at the PCI hospital (control: 72 mins;IQR [23] vs 1st wave: 80 mins;IQR [66.5], P=0.042). Conclusion: Enhanced infection prevention and control procedures considering the COVID-19 pandemic did not impede the delivery of pPCI in our single centre cohort. The public health impact of the pandemic has been demonstrated with times being significantly impacted by patient related delays. The recovery of public engagement in emergency medi-cal services must become the focus for public health initiatives as we emerge from the height of COVID-19 disease burden in the UK.